“Power may be defined as the production of intended effects.” — Bertrand Russell
A few months ago, I sat on a leadership panel with three other business leaders. The room was full of young executives and entrepreneurs — smart, ambitious, and refreshingly direct. Near the end, the moderator asked a question that landed with unusual weight:
“What does the younger generation get wrong about power in organizations?”
I answered briefly on stage. But the question deserves a longer, clearer treatment — because most young professionals don’t misunderstand power because they’re naïve. They misunderstand it because they assume power works like it should (fair, rational, merit-based) rather than how it actually works (human, messy, relationship-driven).
Let’s start with a definition that removes most illusions:
Power is not “what I can force,” but “what I can get done through others without damaging the relationship and the system.”
That last part matters. Anyone can force compliance once. Actual power is repeatable. Sustainable. It gets results while preserving trust.
Here are the most common blind spots I see.
1) They think power is a title
Titles matter — especially in regulated, hierarchical environments. But in practice, most organizational power is a blend of permission, trust, and access.
Power shows up in small, very concrete ways:
- Who gets invited early into conversations?
- Who gets the benefit of the doubt?
- Who can unblock decisions quickly?
- Who is listened to before the meeting ends?
A hard truth: if you’re not in the room early, you’re not in the decision. Young leaders often assume a good idea will travel on its own. In actual organizations, ideas travel through people.
2) They don’t distinguish formal power from real power
Formal authority lives on the org chart. Real power lives in the network.
Real power sits with those who control:
- Information flow
- Budgets and resource allocation
- Priorities and sequencing
- Access to the CEO/board
- Risk gates and approvals
- Reputation and public narrative
- Execution speed
Many young leaders “fight” the org chart instead of mapping the actual system: who influences whom, who can say “no” quietly, and who can make “yes” happen quickly.
3) They overestimate merit and underestimate “felt reliability”
Competence is necessary. But influence often follows predictability — what I call “felt reliability.”
People ask (sometimes unconsciously):
- Do you deliver what you promised?
- Do you reduce friction or add it?
- Do you make your boss feel calm or anxious?
- Do you anticipate risks or surprise people at the last minute?
Organizations reward the person who makes outcomes feel safer. Not because safety is inspiring — but because uncertainty is expensive.
4) They forget that power is borrowed before it is earned
Early in your leadership career, much of your power is borrowed. It comes from:
- Your boss’s mandate
- The institution’s brand
- The role you temporarily occupy
Borrowed power works — until it doesn’t. A crisis hits. Your sponsor leaves. A re-org happens. Suddenly, the badge matters less than your record.
Earned power remains: credibility, proven competence, relationships, consistency under pressure. That is why serious leaders invest in trust like it is capital — because it is.
5) They assume values can be “installed” directly
Younger generations arrive (rightly) with ideals: transparency, fairness, meritocracy. The mistake is thinking that values become real because we say them loudly.
In organizations, values become reality only through levers:
- Who wins and who loses?
- Which risk gets reduced?
- Which metric changes?
- What incentives move?
- What alliances are built?
- Which trade-offs do people accept?
Good intentions are not a strategy. Values need architecture. If you want fairness, you must design systems that produce it — not just speeches that praise it.
6) They confuse visibility with influence
Visibility is being seen: presentations, Slack presence, personal brand, “being active.” Influence is being consequential.
Influence is:
- When you speak, a decision changes
- A priority shifts
- A resource is reallocated
- A timeline becomes real
- A conflict is resolved.
Some of the most powerful people in a company are not visible. They are trusted. People consult them early. They are the quiet “go-to” when the stakes are high.
7) They assume logic wins
Logic matters — but it competes with forces that are just as real:
- Identity: “What does this say about us?”
- Status: “Who gains or loses?”
- Fear: “What might go wrong?”
- Loyalty: “Who are we backing?”
The best idea still needs a coalition. If you rely on logic alone, you will be right — often — and irrelevant — too often.
8) They treat politics as dirty instead of inevitable
“Politics” is frequently just competing priorities under scarce resources.
Refusing to engage doesn’t make you principled. It can make you irrelevant.
The ethical move is not to avoid politics. It is to play the game without becoming the game:
- advocate without humiliating
- negotiate without lying
- build alliances without selling your integrity
- win without poisoning the system.
9) They underestimate that power carries moral and psychological costs
A big role means: unpopular decisions, disappointed people, imperfect compromises, time pressure, and ambiguity.
Many young executives think power brings “freedom.” The truth is: power brings responsibility, exposure, and decision-making loneliness.
10) They want fairness more than they want effectiveness
Fairness matters. But organizations reward what moves results.
Power flows to those who:
- solve painful problems
- protect priorities
- prevent embarrassment
- create momentum
- make execution easier for everyone else.
If you want influence, become useful where it hurts.
11) They mistake bluntness for courage
Directness helps — when paired with timing and relationships. “Speaking truth to power” without social skills often becomes “speaking once and being ignored forever.”
Courage is not volume. Courage is strategic clarity:
- saying the hard thing at the right moment
- in the right language
- with a path forward
- without turning it into a public duel.
12) They think independence is the goal
In organizations, power grows through interdependence:
- being the connector between teams
- being trusted across functions
- making other people successful
- becoming the bridge that prevents fragmentation
If you are the bridge, you matter.
The distillation
If I had to compress the lesson for a young executive into one sentence, it would be this:
Don’t chase power as status. Build it as infrastructure: trust, competence, alliances, and a reputation for delivering without burning people — or the system.
And a practical rule you can test in any organization:
Power is the ability to get things done through other people, repeatedly, without forcing them.
That is not cynicism. It is realism. And realism is the beginning of mature leadership.
Questions for Reflection
- Where do you currently rely too much on title, role, or formal authority?
2. Who has real influence in your organization, even if they do not
appear powerful on the chart?
3. Where are you confusing visibility with genuine influence?
📚Further Reading
- Jeffrey Pfeffer — Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations
Pfeffer treats power not as a dirty word, but as a necessary leadership tool for mobilizing resources, building support, and getting things done inside real organizations. It fits your post’s central idea: young leaders must understand the network, not only the org chart. - Jeffrey Pfeffer — 7 Rules of Power
Pfeffer argues that power increases one’s ability to get things done and offers practical rules such as networking, building a powerful brand, and using power once acquired. - Ronald S. Burt — Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
Burt explains how people who sit at the intersection of different groups gain advantage, while closed networks create trust and coordination. - Karen Dillon — HBR Guide to Office Politics
The book focuses on navigating office politics ethically, gaining influence, and handling conflict without losing one’s values. - Patrick Lencioni — The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
Useful for the team-level consequences of poor power dynamics: lack of trust, fear of conflict, avoidance of accountability, and weak commitment.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn commissions from qualifying purchases linked in this post without additional costs to readers – thank you for supporting the endeavors behind ‘The Chairman’s Playbook’!
Leave a Reply